Skip to content
Published 2026-02-18 · 7 min read

Acoustic Ceiling Options for Call Centers

Call centers have some of the toughest acoustic challenges in commercial buildings. Here's how to solve them from the ceiling down.

Call centers are acoustic nightmares. Fifty, a hundred, sometimes hundreds of people all talking at the same time in an open floor plan. Every voice adds to the overall noise level. Agents can't hear callers. Callers hear background chatter. Quality scores drop. Turnover goes up. The ceiling is the single most impactful surface you can address to fix this.

Why Call Centers Are So Challenging

The core problem is simple: too many voices in too little space with not enough absorption. Most call centers use an open office layout to maximize density. Cubicle partitions — when they exist at all — are typically 42-54 inches tall, which does almost nothing for sound above seated head height.

Sound travels upward, bounces off the ceiling, and reflects back down to adjacent workstations. In a call center with standard ceiling tiles (NRC 0.55), roughly half the sound energy hitting the ceiling bounces back into the room. With 100 people talking, that reflected energy turns into a wall of noise.

The result: agents raise their voices to be heard, which raises the overall noise level, which forces everyone to talk even louder. Acousticians call this the Lombard effect, and it's devastating in call centers.

What NRC Rating Do You Need?

For call centers, you want the highest NRC rating you can get in the ceiling. Here's how the numbers translate in practice:

  • NRC 0.55-0.65 (standard tiles) — barely adequate for a quiet office. Completely insufficient for a call center.
  • NRC 0.70-0.80 — minimum acceptable for a call center with moderate density.
  • NRC 0.85-0.95 — recommended for high-density call centers. This is where products like Armstrong Ultima (NRC 0.90) and fiberglass tiles shine.
  • NRC 1.00+ — achievable with baffles and clouds or specialty absorbers. Worth the investment for 24/7 operations.

Don't confuse NRC with CAC (Ceiling Attenuation Class). CAC measures sound blocking between rooms. In an open call center, CAC doesn't matter — there are no walls to the ceiling. NRC is what you care about.

Best Ceiling Products for Call Centers

High-NRC Acoustical Tiles

The easiest upgrade is swapping standard tiles for high-performance ones:

  • Armstrong Ultima — NRC 0.90, CAC 35. The workhorse for acoustically demanding spaces. Available in multiple sizes and edge profiles.
  • Armstrong Optima — NRC 0.95-1.00. Fiberglass panels that absorb nearly all sound that hits them. Excellent for call centers.
  • USG Mars High-NRC — NRC 0.90. Similar performance to Ultima at a competitive price.
  • CertainTeed Symphony m — NRC 0.90. Good option when the spec calls for CertainTeed products.

For a call center, upgrading from NRC 0.55 tiles to NRC 0.90 tiles can reduce perceived noise levels by 40-50%. It's one of the highest-impact investments a call center can make.

Acoustic Baffles

If the ceiling is exposed (no grid system) or if you need additional absorption beyond what tiles alone can provide, acoustic baffles are the answer.

Baffles hang vertically from the structure above and absorb sound on both faces, giving you double the absorption per square foot of material compared to flat ceiling tiles. They work especially well in spaces with high ceilings or exposed structure.

Baffles vs tiles isn't an either-or choice in many call centers. The most effective setups use high-NRC tiles in the grid plus baffles in strategic areas — above the densest seating clusters or in areas where reflected noise is worst.

Acoustic Clouds

For call centers with exposed ceilings or where you want to create acoustic zones within an open floor plan, suspended clouds are effective. Large acoustic panels hung horizontally above workstation clusters create localized absorption zones that reduce noise at the team level.

Design Strategies Beyond the Ceiling

The ceiling is the biggest lever, but it's not the only one. A comprehensive approach includes:

Sound masking. Electronic sound masking systems generate a uniform background noise (similar to gentle air flow) that covers speech sounds, making conversations less intelligible at a distance. Sound masking works with the ceiling — the ceiling absorbs reflected sound while masking covers what's left. Most call centers need both.

Partition height. If partitions are only 42 inches, consider going to 54 or 60 inches. The higher the partition, the less direct sound path between stations. Combined with a high-NRC ceiling, taller partitions make a measurable difference.

Wall treatments. In smaller call centers, acoustical wall panels on perimeter walls add absorption. Every absorptive surface helps reduce the overall reverberant noise level.

Layout planning. Orient workstations so agents face away from each other when possible. Avoid long rows where sound can travel unobstructed. Break the space into clusters with varying orientation.

Cost vs. Impact

Upgrading a call center ceiling from standard tiles to high-NRC products typically costs $3-6 per square foot, including removal and disposal of existing tiles. For a 10,000 SF call center, that's $30,000-60,000.

Consider the ROI: if better acoustics reduce agent turnover by even a few percentage points, the ceiling pays for itself within a year. The cost of recruiting and training a single call center agent is typically $5,000-10,000. Reducing annual turnover from 30% to 25% in a 100-seat center saves $25,000-50,000 per year in hiring costs alone.

That's before factoring in improved call quality scores, reduced sick days (noise-related stress is real), and better customer satisfaction.

Getting Started

If you manage a call center in the Sacramento area and noise is affecting your operations, start with a ceiling assessment. We'll evaluate your current ceiling, measure the space, and recommend the most cost-effective upgrade path — whether that's a tile swap, adding baffles, or a combination approach.

Request a call center acoustic assessment →